University of Alberta Study Reveals Tree Planting Trends in Small Cities

A recent study from the University of Alberta has shed light on the motivations behind tree planting among residents in small cities, particularly focusing on Camrose, Alberta, a community of approximately 20,000 people. This research, one of the first of its kind in Canada, aims to understand what influences local residents to plant or remove trees on their properties, offering valuable insights for municipalities seeking to enhance urban tree cover.

The study surveyed 548 residents and examined their attitudes, knowledge, and personal backgrounds to determine how these factors contribute to the city’s tree canopy. According to Greg King, an associate professor at Augustana Campus and co-author of the study, urban trees play an essential role in providing benefits such as carbon storage and shade. He emphasized the importance of understanding why residents choose to plant or remove trees, as approximately 50 to 60 percent of urban trees in North America are located on private property.

Community Perspectives on Trees

The research revealed that residents of Camrose generally have a positive attitude toward trees. Most respondents expressed a preference for a diverse selection of trees and valued larger trees in their yards. Interestingly, many did not perceive their trees as nuisances but rather as assets. King noted that personal experiences significantly shape residents’ feelings about trees. For example, those who enjoy relaxing in the shade of a tree may be more inclined to keep it, while individuals burdened by the upkeep, such as raking leaves, might view trees less favorably.

On average, each resident reported planting about six trees and removing three, resulting in a net gain of three trees per household. The survey indicated that approximately 61 percent of participants felt knowledgeable about trees, which likely influences their decisions regarding planting and removal. Co-author Luke Beattie, who contributed to the study as an undergraduate researcher, pointed out that residents’ understanding of tree species can help them make informed choices, such as replacing certain trees with those that attract pollinators.

Demographics and Decision-Making

The study also identified demographic factors that positively correlated with tree planting. Older residents, those who had lived in their properties longer, and homeowners were more likely to contribute to a net gain in trees. Beattie explained that homeownership provides individuals with the authority to plant trees, while longer residency offers more opportunities to do so. Additionally, he noted that older residents may spend more time on yard work, further contributing to tree planting efforts.

While environmental benefits are often highlighted in discussions about urban forestry, the research indicated that aesthetic and economic considerations were significant motivators for residents. Approximately 75 percent of respondents believed that trees enhanced the visual appeal of their yards, and 60 percent felt that trees increased their property value. King observed that there was no strong correlation between environmental attitudes and tree planting or removal decisions.

The findings present opportunities for smaller municipalities like Camrose to develop effective public awareness campaigns that resonate with their residents. King suggested that city communications should highlight both the economic and environmental benefits of trees. By framing messages around the enhancement of property value and aesthetic appeal, cities may engage a broader audience.

Younger residents are another key demographic that requires targeted outreach. According to Beattie, younger individuals, particularly renters who do not have long-term ties to their properties, may not be as inclined to plant trees. Engaging this group through urban forest campaigns could foster a greater appreciation for tree planting and maintenance.

Although this study focuses specifically on Camrose, the insights gained can inform tree management strategies in other small municipalities. Aligning city policies with residents’ behaviors and attitudes may lead to improved outcomes for urban forest sustainability. The co-authors of the study also include Glen Hvenegaard, a professor of environmental science at Augustana Campus. The research received funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council through the Augustana Campus Research Committee. By understanding the factors that drive tree planting in small cities, communities can work towards enhancing their urban forests for future generations.