Connect with us

Top Stories

Three Saskatoon Police Officers Dismissed Following Misconduct

Editorial

Published

on

Three officers from the Saskatoon Police Service (SPS) were dismissed this week following an investigation into their conduct during an off-duty incident that took place last year. Police Chief Cam McBride stated that while the decision was difficult, it was necessary to uphold the integrity and accountability expected from law enforcement.

In a statement released on Wednesday, McBride emphasized the importance of maintaining the highest standards within the police force. “The actions we’ve taken here today reflect our commitment to upholding the highest standards of integrity and accountability and demonstrate that no one is above the expectations of this organization or the trust placed in us by the community,” he said.

Background of the Incident

The dismissals come nearly a year after the SPS announced the suspension of six officers in November 2024 while investigations were ongoing. At that time, Chief McBride indicated that details regarding the suspensions could not be immediately disclosed. However, it was revealed that five of the suspensions were linked to an administrative review initiated in mid-September 2024, following an off-duty gathering.

The officers dismissed include two constables, one with nine years of service and the other with ten years, along with a special constable who served for two years. The SPS confirmed that these three individuals were deemed unsuitable for police service under The Police Act, 1990. Following the investigation, two other officers returned to work in April 2025.

Details of the Investigations

Reports indicate that the suspensions were triggered by an incident at a house party hosted by a member of the emergency response team. Allegations emerged that a female officer was physically assaulted during the event, and it was suggested that an individual affiliated with an outlaw motorcycle gang attended the party, raising concerns for the police’s undercover operations.

The SPS has completed a professional standards investigation into the incident, while the Saskatchewan Serious Incident Response Team (SIRT) continues to investigate one aspect of the case. Under Section 61 of The Police Act, 1990, the dismissed officers have the right to appeal their terminations. If an appeal occurs, a public hearing will be conducted before an independent officer appointed by the Minister Responsible for The Police Act, 1990.

In light of the incident, Chief McBride reiterated the importance of public trust and transparency. “We know that public trust is rooted in transparency, and we are committed to sharing the conclusion of the ongoing investigations and appeal processes when they are concluded,” he stated.

The SPS also acknowledged recent media reports highlighting support for the suspended officers and the potential impact on other employees. McBride recognized the concerns raised within the service and the community, acknowledging that the integrity of the organization is paramount.

“The public trust and well-being of all our members continue to be our priorities,” he added. “A service is challenged when even one of its members strays from that commitment, but I am dedicated to leading an organization that upholds the code of ethics we have all sworn to.”

Since November 2024, the SPS has taken action against three additional officers in unrelated incidents. Notably, a 22-year-old sergeant was suspended last November and subsequently dismissed in March 2025. Two other officers remain suspended while investigations into separate incidents from January and February are ongoing.

As the SPS navigates these challenges, it remains focused on maintaining high standards of conduct and ensuring the trust of the community it serves.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.