Connect with us

Science

League of Legends Named Most Challenging Game in New Assessment

Editorial

Published

on

A recent assessment by the video game asset marketplace Chicks Gold has ranked League of Legends as the most difficult video game, achieving a perfect difficulty score of 10 out of 10. This ranking is based on extensive data analysis from howlongtobeat.com, which evaluated completion times and player dropout rates across more than 7,500 games. Online multiplayer games dominated the list, highlighting the substantial commitment required to master these titles.

The study focused on various metrics, including the total hours needed to complete main storylines, side quests, and attaining 100% completion. It also considered the percentage of players who started but did not finish each game. For titles without traditional narratives, such as League of Legends and Dota 2, alternative criteria were employed, including the time needed to unlock all champions or achieve mastery at high levels of play.

Top 10 Hardest Video Games Revealed

The analysis identified the top ten hardest video games, all of which require significant time investments. Here are the results:

1. **League of Legends (2009)** – Difficulty Score: 10.00
– Completionist Hours: 3,224.91
– Percentage Retired: 34.6%

2. **Aura Kingdom (2014)** – Difficulty Score: 9.97
– Completionist Hours: 9,341.75
– Percentage Retired: 36.6%

3. **Dota 2 (2013)** – Difficulty Score: 9.89
– Completionist Hours: 2,285.63
– Percentage Retired: 36.8%

4. **Azur Lane (2018)** – Difficulty Score: 9.85
– Completionist Hours: 3,170.63
– Percentage Retired: 37.8%

5. **War Thunder (2012)** – Difficulty Score: 9.82
– Completionist Hours: 4,627.70
– Percentage Retired: 31.1%

6. **World of Warcraft (2004)** – Difficulty Score: 9.81
– Completionist Hours: 5,802.32
– Percentage Retired: 31.6%

7. **World of Tanks Blitz (2016)** – Difficulty Score: 9.78
– Completionist Hours: 3,500
– Percentage Retired: 23.0%

8. **Football Manager 2015 (2014)** – Difficulty Score: 9.69
– Completionist Hours: 902.53
– Percentage Retired: 38.4%

8. **Clicker Heroes (2015)** – Difficulty Score: 9.69
– Completionist Hours: 1,111.10
– Percentage Retired: 37.4%

8. **osu! (2007)** – Difficulty Score: 9.69
– Completionist Hours: 3,431.64
– Percentage Retired: 32.0%

9. **NGU Idle (2019)** – Difficulty Score: 9.68
– Completionist Hours: 4,548.76
– Percentage Retired: 15.0%

10. **Team Fortress 2 (2007)** – Difficulty Score: 9.60
– Completionist Hours: 2,880.56
– Percentage Retired: 31.5%

Insights into Player Commitment and Dropout Rates

The findings reveal that League of Legends not only requires an average of 1,144 hours for competitive play but also sees a significant 34.6% of players abandoning the game before reaching completion. In second place, Aura Kingdom demands an astonishing 9,341 hours for completionists, equivalent to over a year of continuous play, with a dropout rate of 36.6%.

Similarly, Dota 2 ranks third, with players needing approximately 850 hours for main objectives and 2,285 hours for full completion, alongside a retirement rate of 36.8%. The mobile naval warfare game Azur Lane has the highest dropout rate in the top ten at 37.8%, indicating that more than one in three players do not complete it.

The free-to-play game War Thunder holds the fifth position with a difficulty score of 9.82, requiring 4,627 hours for full mastery. In sixth place, World of Warcraft, a staple in the MMORPG genre, demands 5,802 hours for total completion, reflecting its enduring complexity since its launch in 2004.

These results underscore the immense dedication required by players to conquer these challenging games, while also highlighting the significant dropout rates that accompany such intense gaming experiences. The analysis from Chicks Gold serves as a valuable resource for gamers seeking to understand the commitment involved in mastering their favorite titles.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.