Connect with us

Science

League of Legends Declared Most Challenging Video Game in New Study

Editorial

Published

on

A recent analysis has identified League of Legends as the most difficult video game, achieving a perfect difficulty score of 10 out of 10. This assessment, conducted by the video game asset marketplace Chicks Gold, utilized data from howlongtobeat.com to evaluate completion times and player dropout rates across more than 7,500 games. The results highlight the significant challenges posed by online multiplayer games, with eight of the top ten requiring thousands of hours to master.

The comprehensive study assessed various factors including the time required to complete main storylines, side quests, and achieve 100% completion. It also analyzed the percentage of players who started but did not finish these games. For titles without traditional narratives, such as League of Legends and Dota 2, rankings were based on alternative metrics, such as the time taken to unlock all champions or attain high-level mastery.

Top 10 Hardest Video Games

The study revealed the following top ten hardest games based on difficulty scores:

1. **League of Legends** (2009) – Completionist Hours: 3,224.91, Percentage Retired: 34.6%, Difficulty Score: 10.00
2. **Aura Kingdom** (2014) – Completionist Hours: 9,341.75, Percentage Retired: 36.6%, Difficulty Score: 9.97
3. **Dota 2** (2013) – Completionist Hours: 2,285.63, Percentage Retired: 36.8%, Difficulty Score: 9.89
4. **Azur Lane** (2018) – Completionist Hours: 3,170.63, Percentage Retired: 37.8%, Difficulty Score: 9.85
5. **War Thunder** (2012) – Completionist Hours: 4,627.70, Percentage Retired: 31.1%, Difficulty Score: 9.82
6. **World of Warcraft** (2004) – Completionist Hours: 5,802.32, Percentage Retired: 31.6%, Difficulty Score: 9.81
7. **World of Tanks Blitz** (2016) – Completionist Hours: 3,500, Percentage Retired: 23.0%, Difficulty Score: 9.78
8. **Football Manager 2015** (2014) – Completionist Hours: 902.53, Percentage Retired: 38.4%, Difficulty Score: 9.69
8. **Clicker Heroes** (2015) – Completionist Hours: 1,111.10, Percentage Retired: 37.4%, Difficulty Score: 9.69
8. **osu!** (2007) – Completionist Hours: 3,431.64, Percentage Retired: 32.0%, Difficulty Score: 9.69
9. **NGU Idle** (2019) – Completionist Hours: 4,548.76, Percentage Retired: 15.0%, Difficulty Score: 9.68
10. **Team Fortress 2** (2007) – Completionist Hours: 2,880.56, Percentage Retired: 31.5%, Difficulty Score: 9.60

The findings indicate that players invest considerable time in mastering these games. For instance, players typically spend an average of 1,144 hours on competitive play in League of Legends. Despite this dedication, a notable 34.6% of players ultimately abandon the game.

In second place, Aura Kingdom demands an extraordinary 9,341 hours for completionists, translating to over a year of continuous play. The game’s dropout rate stands at 36.6%, underscoring its challenging nature.

Following closely, Dota 2 achieved a 9.89 difficulty score, with completionists requiring approximately 2,285 hours. This competitive MOBA also records a 36.8% player retirement rate.

Among the top ten, Azur Lane holds the highest dropout rate at 37.8%, reflecting the struggles some players face in completing its challenges. Meanwhile, War Thunder, with its vast array of over 1,500 playable vehicles, ranks fifth with a difficulty score of 9.82.

The enduring popularity of World of Warcraft, which requires 5,802 hours for full completion, demonstrates the game’s long-standing allure and challenging gameplay. Despite its age, it remains a formidable contender in the gaming landscape.

As the gaming community continues to evolve, these findings shed light on the significant commitment required to excel in some of the most challenging video games available. The detailed analysis not only ranks these games but also highlights the dedication and challenges faced by players around the world.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.