Connect with us

Health

New Pharmacy Opens in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside, Sparks Controversy

Editorial

Published

on

The approval of the Flash Pharmacy and Medical Centre in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside has intensified discussions surrounding the province’s “safer supply” program. Located at 66 West Hastings, this new pharmacy marks the sixth establishment in a densely packed area, which has been scrutinized for its handling of prescribed opioids.

The controversy surrounding this latest pharmacy emerges less than a year after a leaked document from the British Columbia Ministry of Health revealed investigations into over 60 pharmacies in the neighborhood. Allegations included offering incentives to clients to secure dispensing fees, which could reach as high as $11,000. The document suggested that a “significant portion” of prescribed opioids was being diverted to the illicit market, implicating not only pharmacies but also doctors and organized crime.

Elenore Sturko, the BC Conservative Party public safety critic, expressed concerns about the ongoing investigation and the lack of government accountability. “As far as we can tell, those practices haven’t stopped,” she stated. “It is actually the fault of the government for setting up a system that allows for this kind of exploitation.”

Residents in the Downtown Eastside have reported that some pharmacies continue to offer cash kickbacks to patients in exchange for prescriptions. Sturko highlighted the human cost of these practices, emphasizing, “We’re talking about people who are very, very sick… instead they’ve been both exploited and also given a currency, whether it’s actual currency or other items, to trade or the drugs themselves to be traded.”

Concerns have grown in light of the province’s ongoing drug crisis. Sturko asserted that the approval of another pharmacy in this area raises significant worries about the potential for exploitation, stating, “This is fueling the fentanyl trade; it is not helping people recover and the results have been disastrous.”

Efforts to reach Health Minister Josie Osborn for comment have been unsuccessful for nearly three weeks. In a recent overhaul of the safer supply program, the B.C. government shifted from allowing drug users to take their medications home to a “witness model,” where patients must consume their drugs under the supervision of healthcare workers.

Despite these changes, advocates argue for the expansion of the safer supply program. Speaking on International Overdose Awareness Day, former B.C. chief coroner Lisa Lapointe emphasized the program’s importance. “Providing pharmaceutical alternatives, a safer provision of drugs, is the way to keep people alive now so we can help them in their treatment journey,” she said.

In contrast, Sturko contends that there is no evidence supporting the effectiveness of the program in saving lives. She pointed to the federal government’s recent decision to cut funding for safer supply programs in B.C. as further proof that the current approach is failing. Instead, she advocates for a focus on evidence-based treatments that genuinely assist individuals struggling with addiction, stating, “We’re not just talking about how to better dispense drugs to eliminate the exploitation, but looking at the overall value of a program.”

The College of Pharmacists of B.C. has reported taking action against four pharmacists in Vancouver to protect public health. However, the allegations outlined in the Ministry of Health document remain unproven. As the situation develops, the conversation surrounding safer supply programs and their ramifications for public health continues to evolve.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.