Connect with us

Business

Canada’s Climate Commitments Falter Ahead of COP30 Summit

Editorial

Published

on

As Canada prepares for the upcoming COP30 climate summit in Brazil, its track record on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions raises significant concerns. Once a vocal proponent of global climate action, Canada has increasingly deviated from its commitments, failing to meet any GHG reduction targets since 1990. By the end of the 1990s, emissions had surged to 140 million tonnes, reflecting a 23 percent increase from 1990 levels. This trend has continued, solidifying Canada’s position as the only G7 nation whose emissions have risen since that pivotal year.

The roots of Canada’s emissions growth can be traced primarily to the country’s oilsands industry. Following the initial boom in the late 1990s, Canada became the fourth-largest oil producer globally, significantly increasing production levels. In 2024, Canada is projected to produce a record 5.1 million barrels of oil per day, which has contributed to a sharp rise in GHG emissions from the sector. The most recent national inventory for the United Nations outlined that emissions from upstream oil and gas activities nearly doubled from 1990 to 2023, with oilsands emissions alone hitting a staggering 89 million tonnes in 2023.

Policy Directions and Future Projections

Despite its dismal climate record, Canada’s current government appears to prioritize oil production over emission reductions. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has set ambitious goals for increasing oil production, envisioning an output of eight million barrels per day by 2035. This plan represents a 57 percent increase over Canada’s previous records and does not address the corresponding rise in GHG emissions that such growth would necessitate.

The federal government, led by Prime Minister Mark Carney, is considering implementing an oil and gas emissions cap, a measure aimed at curbing emissions growth. Nevertheless, projections suggest that even with this cap, oilsands production could rise to four million barrels per day by 2030, pushing emissions to an estimated 92.4 million tonnes. This figure would surpass the previous record reported in Canada’s latest GHG national inventory.

The recent federal budget did little to clarify the government’s stance on emissions reduction, indicating a potential shift away from the cap in favor of alternative measures such as carbon pricing and methane regulations. Critics argue that these lack of specifics may dilute the efficacy of Canada’s climate strategy, further entrenching the country’s reliance on fossil fuels.

Global Implications of Canada’s Inaction

Supporters of Canada’s current policies often argue that the nation’s emissions are relatively small compared to larger emitters like the United States and China. However, this perspective fails to acknowledge that countries emitting less than two percent of global GHG emissions collectively contribute to over one-third of worldwide emissions. As highlighted by climate expert Hannah Ritchie, Canada’s emissions are significant when viewed in the context of global climate goals.

To restore its reputation as a leader in climate action, Canada must reassess its priorities. True progress demands a shift away from increasing oil production and a commitment to reducing emissions from the oilsands. The upcoming COP30 summit offers an opportunity for Canada to reaffirm its dedication to global climate initiatives, but this will require substantial changes in policy and public commitment.

As the summit approaches, the world will be watching how Canada reconciles its energy ambitions with its climate responsibilities. The decisions made in the coming weeks could have lasting implications for both national and global climate efforts.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.